Today’s article is one from a
few months ago, from “The New York Times” and talks about Sikhs in the U.S.
Army:
July 7, 2013
Taking On Rules to Ease Sikhs’ Path to the Army
By JAMES DAO
Richard
Perry/The New York Times
“Asking a person to choose
between religion and country, that’s not who we are as a nation,” said Maj.
Kamaljeet Singh Kalsi, above, at home last month in New Jersey.
Leah
Nash for The New York Times
Charanpreet
Singh at home in Oregon on Sunday. He enlisted in the Army but his application
for a religious exception was rejected, meaning he might have been forced to
cut his hair.
But when Maj. Kamaljeet Singh
Kalsi, an American Sikh raised in New Jersey, signed up for the United States
Army, that tradition counted for nothing. Before sending him to officer basic
training, the Army told him that he would have to give up the basic symbols of
his religion: his beard, knee-length hair and turban.
In good Sikh tradition, he resisted. Armed with petitions
and Congressional letters, he waged a two-year campaign that in 2009 resulted
in the Army granting him a special exception for his unshorn hair, the first
such accommodation to a policy established in the 1980s.
Since then, two other Sikhs have won accommodations from
the Army. But many others have failed. And so now, as he prepares to leave
active duty, Major Kalsi, who earned a Bronze Star in Afghanistan, is waging a
new campaign: to rescind those strict rules that he believes have blocked
hundreds of Sikhs from joining the military.
“Folks say, ‘If you really want to serve, why don’t you
cut your beard?’ ” said Major Kalsi, a doctor who is the medical director of
emergency medical services at Fort Bragg in North Carolina. “But asking a
person to choose between religion and country, that’s not who we are as a
nation. We’re better than that. We can be Sikhs and soldiers at the same time.”
At stake for the military is the uniformity in appearance
that it deems necessary for good order and discipline. “A neat and well-groomed
appearance is fundamental to Army service,” said Troy A. Rolan, an Army
spokesman. “It is an outward symbol of a disciplined military.”
But to Sikh advocates and their supporters in Congress,
the policies governing appearance are as fundamentally discriminatory to them
as racially segregated units were to blacks, combat prohibitions were to women
and the “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy was to gay men and lesbians.
“They love this country,” said Representative Joseph
Crowley, Democrat of New York, who has been urging the Pentagon to change its
rules regarding Sikhs. “If they want to serve, we should let them do it.”
Sikh leaders cite an additional reason for their push. In
the days after the Sept. 11 attacks, Sikhs were attacked, and at least one was
killed, by assailants who confused them with fundamentalist Muslims. Last year,
a white supremacist shot to
death six Sikhs in their gurudwara, or place of worship, near
Milwaukee.
The more Sikhs wear military, police or firefighter
uniforms, Major Kalsi reasoned, the less often Americans will see them as
threatening outsiders. “When you see a Sikh firefighter save your daughter,
you’ll think, ‘That’s a member of my community,’ ” said Major Kalsi, a
36-year-old father of two.
Although there were Sikhs in the United States in the
19th century, their population grew rapidly in the 1980s after a crackdown
against an independence movement in Punjab caused thousands of Sikhs to
emigrate. Today the Sikh
Coalition, an advocacy group, estimates that about half a million
Sikhs live in America, concentrated in California and New York. There are about
30 million Sikhs worldwide.
The first Sikh guru was born a
Hindu in the 15th century, but the monotheistic religion he founded was more
democratic than Hinduism, rejecting caste and embracing worshipers of both
genders and all races.
As the religion took root in what
is today northwestern India, Sikhs formed their own militias to defend against
marauding armies. When the British colonized the region, they recognized that
fighting spirit and created Sikh battalions to carry the empire’s banner across
the globe. Today, Sikhs continue to serve in the Indian military in numbers far
exceeding their small portion of the population.
Nikky-Guninder Kaur Singh, the chairwoman of the
department of religious studies at Colby College in Maine, said the five
articles of Sikh faith were established by the 10th Sikh guru to give his
people a sense of identity when they were chafing under the Islamic Mughal
court of Delhi.
The five articles are unshorn hair, a comb, a wristband
made of iron or steel, underwear (a symbol of sexual modesty and personal
hygiene) and a sword. The turban is worn as a sign of religious respect but
also as a matter of practicality, to bind up long hair.
“To challenge that oppression, guru said, ‘Be who you
are: hold your sword, wear your hair long,’ ” Dr. Singh said. “It was partly to
instill courage.”
Until 1974, Sikhs were allowed to serve in the United
States military with unshorn hair and beards. But in the 1980s, stricter rules
regarding personal appearance were enacted. Sikhs on active duty at that time
were allowed to keep their articles of faith, but future recruits were required
to seek case-by-case exceptions. No one succeeded until Major Kalsi in 2009.
Petitioning can be time-consuming and difficult. And
because accommodations are based partly on military necessity, recruits without
special skills like being doctors or speaking foreign languages can easily be
rejected. Moreover, exceptions are viewed as temporary, meaning Sikh soldiers
can be ordered to cut their hair and shave their beards at any time.
Among the concerns raised by the armed services — all branches
have rules similar to the Army’s, according to the Sikh Coalition — is whether
Sikh men can safely wear helmets and gas masks.
But Major Kalsi, who spent seven months in Afghanistan in
2011 running a field hospital in Helmand Province, said he routinely wore a
helmet over his long hair, which he bound under a special wrap. He noted that
the Israeli military, as well as bearded American Special Operations troops,
had proved that gas masks worked over thick beards.
Major Kalsi has even created his own military turbans,
which bear his rank insignia and are made from the same camouflage material
used in Army combat uniforms.
A more nuanced challenge for Sikh recruits is overcoming
the argument that uniformity of appearance is essential for “unit cohesion,”
the military’s shared sense of purpose and tradition. But Sikhs point to the
British, Canadian and Indian militaries, where Sikhs are allowed to wear
unshorn hair and beards, as evidence that their articles of faith do not
undermine esprit de corps.
“On the battlefield, people won’t say, ‘You have a beard
and turban — don’t save my life,’ ” said Specialist Simranpreet Lamba, an Army
medic based at Joint Base Lewis-McChord in Washington State.
Specialist Lamba, 29, said he had dreamed of joining the
military as a child in India.
After he immigrated to the United States in 2006, he
decided to enlist after Major Kalsi received his exception. The Army granted
him an accommodation under a program for immigrants with foreign language
skills.
Though Specialist Lamba said he sometimes got quizzical
looks, his commanders and unit mates had been very welcoming. “My brigade is so
used to me, they don’t look at me as someone who is different,” he said.
Charanpreet Singh, 26, who lives near Portland, Ore., was
thwarted by the rules. He had planned to begin basic training in April, but the
Army did not approve his accommodation in time, so he received a separation.
But he still longs to enlist. “I liked the ideals of the military life,” he
said. “If they are able to change the rules, I will try again.”
For Harmandeep S. Grover, a 24-year-old immigrant,
joining the Army is very much about becoming an American.
He was recently accepted into the same language-skills
program that Specialist Lamba used to enlist. Now he must wait for the Army to
consider his request for an accommodation.
“I want to be part of this
country,” he said.
No comments:
Post a Comment