Showing posts with label Newspaper article. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Newspaper article. Show all posts

Monday, February 10, 2014

Newspaper article

Today’s article comes from the weekend’s “Indian Economic Times” and talks about setting up a Ministry for Cows.

 

.......not sure what to say about that !!

 

Despite four agencies on bovine welfare, Rajasthan to set up cow ministry soon

 

By ET Bureau | 8 Feb, 2014, 04.14AM IST
By Akshay Deshmane


Rajasthan’s animal husbandry department’s officials are hard at work to set up India’s first ministry for cows.

JAIPUR: Indian officials know bovines are a serious business. Ask those policemen "sent to police lines", whatever that means, for being derelict in protecting Uttar Pradesh minister Azam Khan's buffaloes.

Thankfully, the animals have been rescued, presumably putting an end to rampant cattle rustling in the Wild East. But we need to actually look further west to see a politician putting her money where her mouth is. Vasundhara Raje pledged a ministry for cows during her recent election campaign and having swept to power, guess what, she's sticking to her word.

Religious leaders close to the political leaders
of Rajasthan asked for a cow ministry and that's exactly what they'll get — and that too in the rapid span of two months, a pace that's noticeably faster than that of the average bovine.

Rajasthan's animal husbandry department's officials are hard at work to set up India's first ministry for cows. The ministry will help establish "a world university on cow science" for carrying out research into agriculture and other subjects that centre around the animal, which Hindus regard as holy. It will also thrash out a policy for the protection, conservation and improvement of indigenous breeds besides stemming the trafficking of the animal.

Chief Minister Raje's recent decision to include the cow ministry in her much-touted 60-day governance plan has forced officials to get going with the programme. But being a pioneer isn't easy. In several detailed but off-the-record conversations with ET, the officials didn't seem to be as wildly enthusiastic as they should have been. Confusion and irritation seemed to be the prevailing emotions.

Issues of jurisdiction

Some of them are of the opinion that there's already too much cow-related administration going on. That's just nitpicking, the government might argue, pointing out that there are only four state agencies under the animal husbandry department engaged in the welfare of cows and other bovines. These include the Cow Conservation Directorate, Gau Seva Commission, Animal Husbandry Directorate and Rajasthan Livestock Development Board (RLDB).

Each has specific responsibilities that include development and research of cow breeds and fodder; monitoring the 1,304 cow sheds in state; calf protection and urine and dung management; and rescuing stray cattle. "The cow conservation directorate was added only recently, around the time of the assembly elections, adding further to the already elaborate bureaucracy of livestock conservation in a state which has India's largest number of cattle," a senior animal husbandry department official pointed out.

The existence of several departments to conserve and protect cows and other bovines has made the process of setting up an entirely new ministry complicated "due to issues of jurisdiction," he said. Oh, turf battles. Something cows and politicians would understand. The official elaborated on this. The new ministry will have to resolve "jurisdictional issues with other departments such as forest, revenue and Panchayati Raj because of the implication of the activities the cow ministry is expected to undertake," he said.

There's also some legal fine print that could kill the state's admirable initiative. "Legally, states cannot set up ministries. They can only propose and set up a department. So it is likely that, eventually, the state will settle for the option of setting up a department." But all that means is duplication of work, said one former official. "It's good if they want to protect cows and start a ministry for that," said Dhirendra Bhandari, former director of the state's animal husbandry department and chairman of Rajasthan Gaushala Seva Sangh.

"But there are existing institutions doing the job just fine, not creating any pressing need for a cow ministry. During the (Ashok) Gehlot government's reign, Rs 140 crore was allocated for the Animal Husbandry Directorate by the state government and Rs 32 crore disbursed by the Gau Seva
Commission during this financial year for protection and overseeing functioning of cow shelters and cattle."



Sunday, January 26, 2014

Today's newspaper article

Today’s article is from “The New York Times” and talks about something that’s always been of a concern to those of us living in New Delhi – the air quality and pollution levels.  

Beijing’s Bad Air Would Be Step Up for Smoggy Delhi

By GARDINER HARRIS JAN. 25, 2014

People made a fire in New Delhi to keep warm on Friday, one of many sources of pollution that makes the city’s air among the world’s worst. Sami Siva for The New York Times

NEW DELHI — In mid-January, air pollution in Beijing was so bad that the government issued urgent health warnings and closed four major highways, prompting the panicked buying of air filters and donning of face masks. But in New Delhi, where pea-soup smog created what was by some measurements even more dangerous air, there were few signs of alarm in the country’s boisterous news media, or on its effervescent Twittersphere.

Despite Beijing’s widespread reputation of having some of the most polluted air of any major city in the world, an examination of daily pollution figures collected from both cities suggests that New Delhi’s air is more laden with dangerous small particles of pollution, more often, than Beijing’s. Lately, a very bad air day in Beijing is about an average one in New Delhi.

The United States Embassy in Beijing sent out warnings in mid-January, when a measure of harmful fine particulate matter known as PM2.5 went above 500, in the upper reaches of the measurement scale, for the first time this year. This refers to particulate matter less than 2.5 micrometers in diameter, which is believed to pose the greatest health risk because it penetrates deeply into lungs.

Take a Deep Breath

Daily peak density of PM2.5, a harmful particulate matter. The World Health Organization recommends a daily mean exposure limit of 25 micrograms per cubic meter.

http://graphics8.nytimes.com/newsgraphics/2014/01/25/delhi-pollution-chart/9a4d4edcdadc516512cb594682109bc9e0d4461a/0126-web-INDIA-artboard_1.png
micrograms per cubic meter
800
New Delhi
700
600
500
400
300
200
100
Beijing
0
Jan. 1
7
14
21
JAN. 25, 2014

By The New York Times
Sources: Delhi Pollution Control Committee; U.S. Embassy in Beijing

But for the first three weeks of this year, New Delhi’s average daily peak reading of fine particulate matter from Punjabi Bagh, a monitor whose readings are often below those of other city and independent monitors, was 473, more than twice as high as the average of 227 in Beijing. By the time pollution breached 500 in Beijing for the first time on the night of Jan. 15, Delhi had already had eight such days. Indeed, only once in three weeks did New Delhi’s daily peak value of fine particles fall below 300, a level more than 12 times the exposure limit recommended by the World Health Organization.

“It’s always puzzled me that the focus is always on China and not India,” said Dr. Angel Hsu, director of the environmental performance measurement program at the Yale Center for Environmental Law and Policy. “China has realized that it can’t hide behind its usual opacity, whereas India gets no pressure to release better data. So there simply isn’t good public data on India like there is for China.”

Experts have long known that India’s air is among the worst in the world. A recent analysis by Yale researchers found that seven of the 10 countries with the worst air pollution exposures are in South Asia. And evidence is mounting that Indians pay a higher price for air pollution than almost anyone. A recent study showed that Indians have the world’s weakest lungs, with far less capacity than Chinese lungs. Researchers are beginning to suspect that India’s unusual mix of polluted air, poor sanitation and contaminated water may make the country among the most dangerous in the world for lungs.

India has the world’s highest death rate because of chronic respiratory diseases, and it has more deaths from asthma than any other nation, according to the World Health Organization. A recent study found that half of all visits to doctors in India are for respiratory problems, according to Sundeep Salvi, director of the Chest Research Foundation in Pune.

Clean Air Asia, an advocacy group, found that another common measure of pollution known as PM10, for particulate matter less than 10 micrometers in diameter, averaged 117 in Beijing in a six-month period in 2011. In New Delhi, the Center for Science and Environment used government data and found that an average measure of PM10 in 2011 was 281, nearly two-and-a-half times higher.

Perhaps most worrisome, Delhi’s peak daily fine particle pollution levels are 44 percent higher this year than they were last year, when they averaged 328 over the first three weeks of the year. Fine particle pollution has been strongly linked with premature death, heart attacks, strokes and heart failure. In October, the World Health Organization declared that it caused lung cancer.

BREATHLESS Amanat Devi Jain, 4, receives twice-daily breathing treatments for her asthma. Her father said the family breathed normally whenever they left India. Graham Crouch for The New York Times

The United States Embassy in Beijing posts on Twitter the readings of its air monitor, helping to spur awareness of the problem. The readings have more than 35,000 followers. The United States does not release similar readings from its New Delhi Embassy, saying the Indian government releases its own figures.

In China, concerns about air quality have transfixed many urban residents, and some government officials say curbing the pollution is a priority.

But in India, Delhi’s newly elected regional government did not mention air pollution among its 18 priorities, and India’s environment minister quit in December amid widespread criticism that she was delaying crucial industrial projects. Her replacement, the government’s petroleum minister, almost immediately approved several projects that could add considerably to pollution. India and China strenuously resisted pollution limits in global climate talks in Warsaw in November.

Frank Hammes, chief executive of IQAir, a Swiss-based maker of air filters, said his company’s sales were hundreds of times higher in China than in India.

“In China, people are extremely concerned about the air, especially around small children,” Mr. Hammes said. “Why there’s not the same concern in India is puzzling.”

In multiple interviews, Delhiites expressed a mixture of unawareness and despair about the city’s pollution levels. “I don’t think pollution is a major concern for Delhi,” said Akanksha Singh, a 20-year-old engineering student who lives on Delhi’s outskirts in Ghaziabad, adding that he felt that Delhi’s pollution problems were not nearly as bad as those of surrounding towns.

A smoggy New Delhi. Sami Siva for The New York Times

In 1998, India’s Supreme Court ordered that Delhi’s taxis, three-wheelers and buses be converted to compressed natural gas, but the resulting improvements in air quality were short-lived as cars flooded the roads. In the 1970s, Delhi had about 800,000 vehicles; now it has 7.5 million, with 1,400 more added daily.

“Now the air is far worse than it ever was,” said Anumita Roy Chowdhury, executive director of the Center for Science and Environment.

Indians’ relatively poor lung function has long been recognized, but researchers assumed for years that the difference was genetic.

Then a 2010 study found that the children of Indian immigrants who were born and raised in the United States had far better lung function than those born and raised in India.

“It’s not genetics; it’s mostly the environment,” said Dr. MyLinh Duong, an assistant professor of respirology at McMaster University in Hamilton, Ontario.

In a study published in October, Dr. Duong compared lung tests taken in 38,517 healthy nonsmokers from 17 countries who were matched by height, age and sex. Indians’ lung function was by far the lowest among those tested.

All of this has led some wealthy Indians to consider leaving.
Annat Jain, a private equity investor who returned to India in 2001 after spending 12 years in the United States, said his father died last year of heart failure worsened by breathing problems. Now his 4-year-old daughter must be given twice-daily breathing treatments.

“But whenever we leave the country, everyone goes back to breathing normally,” he said. “It’s something my wife and I talk about constantly.”
Malavika Vyawahare contributed reporting from New Delhi, and Edward Wong from Beijing.

A version of this article appears in print on January 26, 2014, on page A6 of the New York edition with the headline: Beijing’s Bad Air Would Be Step Up for Smoggy Delhi.


Thursday, January 23, 2014

Today's newspaper article

Today’s article is from “The Diplomat” website and talks about the antics of the AAP here in New Delhi and their willingness to protest rather than govern.

They did win the New Delhi elections after all !!

Kejriwal’s Antics Cost Him His Honeymoon with The People

Is Arvind Kejriwal not ready to lead New Delhi? His preference for protests over governance indicates as much.

By Sanjay Kumar for The Diplomat
January 23, 2014


After nearly 48 hours under siege, Delhi is gradually returning to normal. The four major metro stations, which remained shut for two days, have been opened and the traffic jams around the city have eased.

The architect of the chaos was none other than the capital’s new Chief Minister (CM) Arvind Kejriwal, a man who captured the imagination of the nation when his nascent political outfit, the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP, or Common Man’s Party) made a startling debut in the elections last month by defeating the two mainstream political parties.

The perennial rebel has been a prominent face of India’s anti-corruption movement since 2011. He received huge support from the people for his anti-corruption activism, support that catapulted him to the helm of Delhi’s government in a little over a year.
But the transformation from rebel to a ruler is proving to be tough for the 45-year old CM.

The sudden sit -in protest by him and his party workers in the heart of the capital this past week indicates as much. Kejriwal went on a flash protest demanding the suspension of policemen who refused to obey the dictates of Law Minister Somnath Bharti.

Last week, the new minister called some local police to his area in the night and asked them to raid a house where some women from Uganda and Nigeria were living. He alleged that the African women, who were living in the lower middle class area of southern Delhi called Khirki Extension, were drug traffickers and prostitutes. Police refused to act in the absence of any warrant and any prior complaint. With camera rolling Bharti railed against police and called names. According to reports, the harried women were attacked inside their house and some reports suggest that they were made to go through cavity searches by the AAP workers.

The whole episode fomented outrage and the AAP government came in for harsh criticism for the highhandedness of its minister. Demands for the minister’s resignation started ringing in the air.

Pushed into a corner, Kejriwal demanded that complete control of police be placed in the hands of the Delhi government. Delhi is a city state that does not enjoy complete control of its law and order machinery like other states.

Later on, the CM shifted the goalposts and demanded the suspension of the policemen who refused to obey the Law Minister. Kejriwal and party workers started an indefinite strike on January 19 near the parliament, creating chaos and undermining security in the sensitive zone of the national capital.

This was the first time in recent memory that an elected Chief Minister and his entire cabinet sat in on a protest. The protest happened very close to the venue where Republic Day parades take place every year on January 26.

On the evening of January 21 the CM suddenly called off the sit-ins after the center agreed to send the policemen on leave. This was not the demand for which Kejriwal had held the whole capital ransom. However, his critics and the media term the CM’s sudden turnabout as a face saver – a climbdown forced on him by backlash from the people of Delhi.

This was the first such public protest by the activist-turned-politician after assuming power in Delhi. Unlike his previous sit-ins, the latest one didn’t the bring Delhi’s middle class, the backbone of Kejriwal’s anti corruption movement, to the street.

The Times of India writes that dwindling support and bad press forced an end to the protests. No more than 400 people came to support him, and the media reports that those who came were brought in from the neighboring state of Haryana. Additionally, the media debated the appropriateness of a CM protesting an issue which merits debate.

Critics say that Kejriwal’s protest was an attempt to divert the nation’s attention from his faltering Law Minister, whose resignation is being sought by political parties and women’s rights organization.

Whatever the reasons for the protest, the rookie politician has lost a substantial chunk of the people’s support in the last 48 hours – support that was hard earned over the last two years. Be it social networking sites, local FM radio stations, or TV studios, voices against the AAP are audible across Delhi.

What also became visible among the highest echelons of the AAP’s leadership during the protests was a particular intolerance towards the media, which has been unkind in its coverage of Kejriwal’s antics. The CM refused to interact with several journalists and TV networks.

Far before the AAP became an institution, it was an idea. The challenge before Kejriwal is to keep this idea alive. This can be done only through good governance, not through political antics.



Wednesday, December 18, 2013

Today's Newspaper articles

Today’s series of articles of which there are quite a few are taken from a number of newspapers such as the Sydney Morning Herald, the Australian, The Telegraph (UK), The Guardian, The Independent, The Daily Mail, The Washington Post and The New York Times.

They talk about something that’s big news here in Delhi at the moment: a growing diplomatic spat between the Americans and the Indians:

 

Indian fury, retaliation after US arrests diplomat


World
Date: December 18, 2013 - 2:10PM

A bulldozer removes the security barriers in front of the US embassy in Delhi. Photo: Reuters

Delhi: India has launched a series of reprisals against US officials as outrage grows over a diplomat's arrest in New York, which Delhi has branded "humiliating".

In an escalating row over the arrest, the Indian government ordered a range of measures including the return of identity cards for US consular officials that speed up travel into and through India, foreign ministry sources said.

"We have ordered the withdrawal of all ID cards that are issued by the Ministry of External Affairs to the officials at the US consulates across India," a senior ministry source told AFP on condition of anonymity.

The government will also stop all import clearances for the US embassy, including liquor, the sources said, while Indian security forces removed barricades from outside the US embassy in Delhi.

The moves come after India's deputy consul general in the US, Devyani Khobragade, was arrested in New York last week while dropping her children off at school.

Ms Khobragade was arrested for allegedly underpaying her domestic helper, who is also an Indian national, and for lying on the helper's visa application form.

Anger over the incident has been mounting in the Indian press, with front-page reports on Tuesday claiming Ms Khobragade had been handcuffed and "strip-searched and confined with drug addicts" after her arrest.
Foreign Minister Salman Khurshid said on Tuesday the government had "put in motion" measures to address the arrest, calling Ms Khobragade's seizure "completely unacceptable".

"We have put in motion what we believe would be effective ways of addressing the issue but also [put] in motion such steps that need to be taken to protect her dignity," Mr Khurshid said, without confirming new reprisals.

US State Department deputy spokesman Marie Harf said on Monday that diplomatic security staff "followed standard procedures" during the arrest before Ms Khobragade was handed over to US Marshals.

Ms Harf also said Ms Khobragade only has immunity from prosecution with respect to duties performed as a consular official, under the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations.

The Indian embassy in Washington said on Friday that the detention was based on "allegations raised by the officer's former India-based domestic assistant".

The domestic worker had "absconded" from her employer in June and was already the subject of an injunction issued by the High Court in Delhi, it said.

AFP


This article was found at: http://www.theage.com.au/world/indian-fury-retaliation-after-us-arrests-diplomat-20131218-hv65z.html

-------------------------------------------------------------------

Indian diplomat's New York arrest causes international furore

·      AAP
·      AP
·      DECEMBER 18, 2013 8:28AM

Indian police remove barricades outside the US Embassy in Delhi in retaliation for the arrest and strip search of an Indian diplomat in New York. Picture: AP Source: AP

THE arrest and strip search of an Indian diplomat in New York has escalated into a major diplomatic furore as India's national security adviser called the woman's treatment "despicable and barbaric."

Devyani Khobragade, India's deputy consul general in New York, is accused of submitting false documents to obtain a work visa for her Manhattan housekeeper.

Indian officials said she was arrested and handcuffed last Thursday as she dropped off her daughter at school, and was kept in a cell with drug addicts before posting $US250,000 bail.

A senior Indian official confirmed reports that she also was stripsearched, which has been portrayed in India as the most offensive and troubling part of the arrest.

The US Marshals Service confirmed Ms Khobragade had been stripsearched and held with other detainees.

Federal authorities said they were looking into the arrest.

"We understand that this is a sensitive issue for many in India," said Marie Harf, State Department deputy spokeswoman. "Accordingly, we are looking into the intake procedures surrounding this arrest to ensure that all appropriate procedures were followed and every opportunity for courtesy was extended."

Ms Harf said federal authorities would work on the issue with India "in the spirit of partnership and cooperation that marks our broad bilateral relationship."

"We certainly don't want this to affect the relationship," she said.

India was ready to retaliate against American diplomats in India by threatening to downgrade privileges and demanding information about how much they pay their Indian household staff, according to the Press Trust of India news agency.

Police also removed the traffic barricades near the US Embassy in New Delhi, a demand by the Indian government in retaliation for Ms Khobragade's treatment, PTI reported.

The barriers were a safety measure.

"We got orders to remove the concrete barriers," said Amardeep Sehgal, station house officer of the Chanakyapuri police station, the one nearest the embassy. "They were obstructing traffic on the road." He refused to say who had given the orders.

Calls to the US Embassy were not immediately returned.

But Ms Harf said the US had made clear to the India government that it needs to uphold its obligations under the Vienna Conventions on diplomatic and consular relations. She said the US takes the safety and security of its diplomats very seriously.

National Security Adviser Shivshankar Menon slammed Ms Khobragade's treatment in New York.

"It is despicable and barbaric," he said.

Prosecutors in New York say Ms Khobragade, 39, claimed she paid her Indian maid
$US4,500 per month but actually paid her less than the US minimum wage.

In order for diplomats and consular officers to get a visa for their personal employees, known as an A-3 visa, they must show proof that the applicant will receive a fair wage, comparable to employment in the US, US Attorney Preet Bharara said in a statement last week.

Federal prosecutors say Ms Khobragade told the housekeeper she would be paid 30,000 rupees per month - about $US573, or $US3.31 per hour. The woman worked for the family from about November 2012 through June 2013, and said she worked far more than 40 hours per week and was paid even less than 30,000 rupees, prosecutors said.
Ms Khobragade has pleaded not guilty and plans to challenge the arrest on grounds of diplomatic immunity, her lawyer said last week.

If convicted, Ms Khobragade faces a maximum sentence of 10 years for visa fraud and five years for making a false declaration. She was arrested outside of her daughter's Manhattan school.

"We are distressed at the treatment that Dr Khobragade has received at the hands of U.S. authorities," said her lawyer, Daniel Arshack. He said she should have diplomatic immunity.

Her case quickly became a major story in India, with politicians urging diplomatic retaliation and TV news channels showing the woman in a series of smiling family photos.

That reaction may look outsized in the United States, but the case touches on a string of issues that strike deeply in India, where the fear of public humiliation resonates strongly and heavy-handed treatment by the police is normally reserved for the poor. For an educated, middle-class woman to face public arrest and a strip search is almost unimaginable, except in the most brutal crimes.

Far less serious protocol complaints have become big issues in the past. Standard security checks in the US regularly are front-page news in India when they involve visiting Indian dignitaries, who are largely exempt from friskings while at home.

India's former speaker of Parliament, Somnath Chatterjee, once refused to attend an international meeting in Australia when he wasn't given a guarantee that he would not have to pass through security. Chatterjee said even the possibility of a security screening was "an affront to India."

The treatment and pay of household staff, meanwhile, is largely seen as a family issue, off-limits to the law.

The fallout from the arrest was growing. Indian political leaders from both the ruling party and the opposition yesterday refused to meet with the US congressional delegation in New Delhi. The Indian government said it was "shocked and appalled at the manner in which the diplomat had been humiliated" in the U.S.

Indian Foreign Secretary Sujata Singh summoned US Ambassador Nancy Powell to register a complaint.

Ms Harf said as India's deputy consul general, Ms Khobragade does not have full diplomatic immunity, but rather consular immunity from the jurisdiction of US courts only with respect to acts performed in the exercise of consular functions. She said the State Department had in September notified India in writing of the allegations against Ms Khobragade.

Ms Harf said the department's diplomatic security team followed standard procedures during the arrest. After her arrest, Ms Khobragade was handed over to US marshals for intake and processing, and Ms Harf said she could not comment on Khobragade's treatment at that point, or answer the allegations she was stripsearched.

Ms Khobragade's father, Uttam Khobragade, told the TimesNow TV news channel that his daughter's treatment was "absolutely obnoxious."

"As a father I feel hurt, our entire family is traumatised," he said.
Indian External Affairs Minister Salman Khurshid said there were "larger issues" involved in the case, but did not elaborate.

"We will deal with them in good time," he said.

AP

-------------------------------------------------------------------

Indian leaders snub American Congressmen as row over public arrest of a senior diplomat grows

 

Indian leaders condemn arrest and strip-search of its diplomat in New York as 'barbaric'

Dr Khobragade, 39, was arrested and handcuffed as she dropped her daughter at school Photo: SPLASH NEWS

2:18PM GMT 17 Dec 2013

Indian leaders boycotted meetings with visiting US Congressmen on Tuesday amid a growing diplomatic row over the arrest and strip-searching of a senior Indian diplomat accused of visa fraud, making false statements and illegally paying her domestic servant below the minimum wage in the United States.

The speaker of the Indian parliament, its national security advisor, home minister and both main contenders to be India’s next prime minister - Rahul Gandhi and Narendra Modi - cancelled planned meetings with the US delegation over what they described as the ‘humiliating’ and ‘barbaric’ treatment of Devyani Khobragade, India’s deputy consul in New York.

Dr Khobragade, 39, was arrested and handcuffed as she dropped her daughter at school and was later strip-searched as part of American screening procedures for detainees.

She faces charges of visa fraud and paying illegal wages below the statutory minimum to her Indian domestic servant.

According to New York Police, Dr Khobragade had made a false statement that her Indian servant would be paid $4,500 (£2,760) per month on her visa application but in fact paid her just $500 (£306). She was arrested last week and held with alleged drug offenders but has since been released on $250,000 (£153,000) bail.

The United States ambassador to India, Nancy Powell, was summoned by India’s foreign secretary to explain Dr Khobragade’s treatment in what India regards as a serious breach of the Vienna Convention on diplomatic immunity. The U.S state department denied it had mistreated Dr Khobragade and said diplomats enjoy immunity only in matters relating to their work. Her treatment – being handcuffed and strip-searched – was normal screening procedure for the U.S Marshall Service, it said.

India’s foreign secretary Sujata Singh was reported to be angry that she had not been told of the diplomat’s impending arrest during her visit to the U.S last week even though the state department had been notificed. India’s External Affairs minister Salman Khurshid said today Dr Khobragade had been subjected to a to”a form of indignity (that) is for us completely unacceptable.”

Narendra Modi, the chief minister of Gujarat and Bharatiya Janata Party leader many expect to be India’s next prime minister said he had “refused to meet the visiting USA delegation in solidarity with our nation, protesting ill-treatment meted to our lady diplomat in USA.”

Pavan Varma, a former senior Indian diplomat said he was “outraged” by the treatment of Dr Khobragade which reflected American “arrogance” and “insensitivity”. It breached the Vienna Convention on the ‘civility’ with which diplomats must be treated and “can only be condoned by the fact that it considers itself to be the most powerful country in the world and the rest of the world should lump it,” he said.

He said many Indian diplomats posted around the world employed Indian household staff on Indian level terms and conditions. “The domestic staff live in with food and entitlement to health benefits, there is support to family members back home. For countries to impose unfeasible criteria on adequate remuneration for other countries, even if it complies with our standards of living and insist the rest is all exploitation is nonsense,” he added.

India now appears set to carry out further retaliation in relation to salaries paid to Indian servants by American diplomats in India. Most domestic servants in New Delhi, including those employed by the staff of various embassies, are paid around 12,000 Rupees ($200 or £120) a month – considerably lower than than the $500 or £306 paid to Dr Khobragade’s housekeeper.

-------------------------------------------------------------------

India escalates diplomatic row after consul's arrest and strip-search in US

Handling of Devyani Khobragade's alleged visa fraud angers Indians with barriers removed from US embassy in reprisal

Indian workers remove a security barrier outside the US embassy in Delhi in retaliation to the alleged mistreatment of Khobragade. Photograph: Saurabh Das/AP

The arrest and strip-search of India's deputy consul general in New York triggered an escalating diplomat dispute on Tuesday, as Indian politicians boycotted a visit by US congressmen and Delhi threatened to remove privileges for US diplomats.

Devyani Khobragade was released on bail two hours after being arrested last week for visa fraud and making false statements on an application for her Indian housekeeper to live and work in New York. prosecutors in New York say Khobragade, 39, claimed she would pay her maid $4,500 (£2,800) a month when applying for a visa at the US embassy in Delhi – but actually paid her $573 (£350) a month, or $3.31 – less than the US minimum wage.

But her public arrest and subsequent treatment as "a common criminal" has prompted outrage at home. India's national security adviser called the treatment of Khobragade on Tuesday "despicable and barbaric".

Nancy Powell, US ambassador to Delhi, was summoned by the Indian foreign secretary, Sujatha Singh, last week and on Tuesday officials said that US diplomats would be asked to reveal full details of how much they paid their own domestic staff in India to ensure compliance with local laws.

Earlier on Tuesday bulldozers removed security barriers outside the US embassy in Delhi – the most visible evidence of the anger in the country sparked by the incident last week.

Politicians – including Rahul Gandhi, the scion of the Nehru-Gandhi dynasty and vice-chairman of the ruling Congress Party, and Narendra Modi, the prime ministerial candidate of the Hindu nationalist opposition – refused to meet a visiting US congressional delegation.

Indian government officials told the Guardian that they were "hurt and shocked".

"No Indian diplomat has been treated this way for decades. [The US] is our friend and strategic ally and you can't just treat a friendly country's representatives like this. This is major, major ill treatment and is totally inexplicable," one said.

The arrest quickly became a major story in India, dominating TV bulletins. According to Indian officials, Khobragade was arrested and handcuffed as she dropped off her daughter at school, then strip-searched and kept in a cell with drug addicts before posting $250,000 bail.

India is acutely sensitive to its international image and status, and in the past far less serious incidents have provoked major clashes. Standard security checks in the US regularly are front-page news here when they involve visiting Indian dignitaries, who are largely exempt from being frisked while at home.

US diplomats in consulates across India have been asked to surrender identity cards issued to them and their families, which entitle them to special privileges. India has also withdrawn all airport passes for consulates and import clearances for the embassy.

The new demand for details of salaries of US consular staff's domestic workers in India could prove embarrassing for the embassy. Many are likely to be found in breach of local standards. "We are applying a principle of strict reciprocity," said the Indian government official.

Khobragade, 39, has pleaded not guilty to the charges, which could lead to a 10-year prison sentence, and plans to challenge the arrest on grounds of diplomatic immunity, her lawyer said last week.

In Washington, the US state department has said that standard procedures were followed during Khobragade's arrest. Officials argue that her immunity from prosecution extends only to actions directly connected to her position.

The consular official's father, Uttam Khobragade, told the TimesNow TV news channel on Tuesday that his daughter's treatment was "absolutely obnoxious".

"As a father I feel hurt, our entire family is traumatised," he said.
In 2010 there was uproar after India's UN envoy, Hardeep Puri, was reportedly asked to remove his turban at a US airport and detained in a holding room when he was refused.

A hands-on search of India's US ambassador, Meera Shankar, at an airport in Mississippi that year also prompted claims that India had been "insulted".

In 2009 Continental Airlines apologised to the former Indian president APJ Abdul Kalam for searching him in Delhi before he boarded a flight to the US, and in 2005 India's former speaker of parliament Somnath Chatterjee refused to attend an international meeting in Australia without a guarantee that he would not have to pass through security.

Chatterjee said even the possibility of a security screening was "an affront to India".

  • © 2013 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved.
-------------------------------------------------------------------

India-US row over arrest of diplomat Devyani Khobragade in New York escalates

 

India summons US ambassador and announces that it is withdrawing a series of diplomatic privileges to US officials


The arrest of an Indian diplomat amid claims she had lied on a visa form for her domestic worker has turned into a major row between Washington and Delhi with India’s national security adviser calling her treatment “despicable and barbaric”.

India on Tuesday summoned the US ambassador and announced that it was withdrawing a series of diplomatic privileges to US officials. It also reopened a road that runs past the US embassy in Delhi but which for several years has been blocked off for security reasons. Several Indian officials declined to meet with members of a visiting US delegation.

“It is despicable and barbaric,” National Security Adviser Shivshankar Menon told the Press Trust of India news agency.

The row follows the arrest last week in New York of Devyani Khobragade, India’s deputy consul general in the city, who has been accused of visa fraud and of making false statements on an application for her housekeeper to work for her in the US.

Indian officials said she was arrested and handcuffed last Thursday as she dropped off her daughter at school, then strip-searched and kept in a cell with drug addicts before posting $250,000 bail.

A spokesman for India’a foreign ministry failed to respond to calls on Tuesday but the Associated Press said a senior Indian official confirmed that the strip search had taken place. The US embassy has yet to comment.

Prosecutors in New York say Ms Khobragade, 39, claimed she paid her Indian maid $4,500 per month but actually paid her less than the US minimum wage. She has pleaded not guilty and plans to challenge the arrest on grounds of diplomatic immunity, her lawyer said last week.

India has reacted with fury to the way its official has been treated, saying Indian diplomats living abroad have for years taken their domestic workers with them and that host governments have had few problems with the issue. Most middle-class Indian homes will employ several domestic workers, often at very low wages.

“They treated her like al-Qa’ida had come to Manhattan,” said analyst and former diplomat KC Singh

Reports suggest the issue dates back several months to when Ms Khobragade’s domestic worker, Sangeeta Richard, requested permission to work for other people on her day off and then later failed to return home to the diplomat’s house.

Ms Richard’s Indian passport was subsequently revoked and she and her family were taken into custody. Subsequent to that, the US authorities have been investigating the circumstances in which she arrived in New York.

A senior member of India’s main opposition party said India should arrest gay partners of US diplomats living in India.

“My suggestion to the government of India is, the media has reported that we have issued visas to a number of US diplomats' companions. Companions means that they are of the same sex,” Yashwant Sinha of the Bharatiya Janata Party told reporters.

He added: “Now, after the Supreme Court ruling, it is completely illegal in our country. Just as paying less wages was illegal in the US. So, why doesn’t the government of India go ahead and arrest all of them?”


@independent.co.uk

-------------------------------------------------------------------

Politicians of all hues CANCEL meetings with US delegation over diplomat strip-search row

 

PUBLISHED: | UPDATED:

India's Deputy Consul General in New York Devyani Khobragade was reportedly strip-searched by New York Police officers

The arrest and strip-search of Indian diplomat Devyani Khobragade by authorities in New York has triggered a furore in India, with Parliamentarians demanding a discussion on the issue in the House.

Congress vice-president Rahul Gandhi, Union Home Minister Sushilkumar Shinde and BJP's prime ministerial candidate Narendra Modi all cancelled their meetings with a visiting delegation of the US Congress in protest against the treatment meted out to the Indian diplomat.

The report that Devyani, accused of visa fraud, was "strip-searched" and detained with sex workers and drug addicts incensed senior leaders, who demanded reciprocal action against US diplomats based in New Delhi.

Former external affairs minister Yashwant Sinha demanded that action should be taken against those US diplomats who have same-sex companions as the Supreme Court has ruled gay sex illegal in the country.

The BJP's prime ministerial candidate Modi, who has been denied a US visa, tweeted that he has cancelled his meeting with the visiting US delegation, comprising senior Congressmen, which was scheduled in Gandhi Nagar on Wednesday.

"Refused to meet the visiting USA delegation in solidarity with our nation, protesting ill treatment meted to our lady diplomat in USA," he tweeted.

Rahul and Shinde also cancelled their meetings with the US delegation on Tuesday.

Lok Sabha Speaker Meira Kumar had refused to host the team on Monday as she felt it was not appropriate to meet Parliamentarians from the US, which has badly treated a senior Indian diplomat.



Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kamal Nath said India cannot be treated like a banana republic.

"We look forward to an unconditional apology from the US," he said.

"The US and other countries should recognise the dignity and respect of other countries.

They cannot deal with other countries in such a manner."
BJP leader Ravi Shankar Prasad said the treatment meted out to the Indian diplomat by the US does not accord to the level of friendship that the Indian government claims to have with the country.

"The way she was arrested after being handcuffed, kept with drug addicts and strip-searched in the police station is condemnable, reprehensible and regrettable and in clear violation of conventions," he said.

JD(U) leader K.C. Tyagi advocated a tit-for-tat policy towards US diplomats in India, and slammed External Affairs Minister Salman Khurshid for meeting a US delegation here after the incident.

Tyagi gave a notice to Rajya Sabha Chairman Hamid Ansari seeking to raise the issue in Zero Hour.

However, it could not be taken up as the House took up the Lokpal Bill for consideration.
Tyagi said he will give a notice again on Wednesday for taking up the issue in the Upper House as the matter was a very serious one.

BSP chief Mayawati also demanded that the government should intervene immediately.

Other Indian diplomats in US maid trouble

In 2011, Prabhu Dayal, the then Consul General in New York, was accused of treating his domestic help as a "slave".

Santosh Bhardwaj, the maid, said in her complaint that she was forced to work long hours for $300 a month, her passport was confiscated and she had to sleep in a storage closet. She also alleged sexual overtures which Dayal vehemently denied.

India backed the diplomat against charges levelled by his former employee and expressed its disappointment with the manner in which the authorities in the US went about investigating this matter.

A Ministry of External Affairs spokesperson said New Delhi was "disappointed and deeply concerned" that Indian diplomats and their family members should be targeted in such a manner by a friendly country like the US.

In 2012, IFS officer Neena Malhotra, then India's cultural and press counsellor in New York, and her husband Jogesh were ordered to pay out nearly $1.5 million for forcing an under-aged Indian girl to work for little pay at their Manhattan apartment.

The case prompted the Indian government to move the Delhi High Court for a restraining order against any adverse directive involving its officials.

The Delhi High Court restrained the maid and her solicitors from pursuing the case and made it clear that only an Indian court will have the jurisdiction to entertain the complaint.

"The alleged treatment has happened within Malhotra's official residence, which is in occupation and belongs to the Indian Government and only the Indian laws would hence apply...," said the court.

-------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Anger brews over diplomat's arrest as New Delhi plans tit-for-tat measures against US


PUBLISHED: | UPDATED:

It was about 4pm on Tuesday when cranes and policemen moved into Nyay Marg. Their objective was to remove the concrete barriers that seal the street off from the public, effectively creating an open-air corridor between the visa section and staff quarters of the giant US embassy in the Capital's diplomatic enclave.

The removal of the barriers - a diplomatic privilege accorded by the host nation - put India on a course of confrontation with the US.

No other embassy in the capital has enjoyed such a privilege; the Indian mission in the US certainly doesn't get such courtesies.

The Delhi Police removes concrete barricades from Nyay Marg

India on Tuesday cracked the whip, bracing itself for a tit-for-tat approach on what many are calling the "bully" behaviour of the US in arresting and strip-searching senior Indian diplomat Devyani Khobragade in New York last week.

It was more than just Nyay Marg. Four Notes Verbales were sent to the US embassy in New Delhi, telling them of the steps being taken. State governments were told that all diplomatic cards would have to be surrendered by December 19.

Officials have been told to ensure that no import proposals or quotas of liquor and food are cleared.

In New Delhi, the embassy has been asked to furnish all tax returns and details of salary paid to employees, both foreign and local, and income tax authorities will be asked to scrutinise the returns.

The airport passes of diplomats are being withdrawn. This is an unprecedented clampdown.

The government is working on three broad points: to review the immunity of US diplomats, restrict their access to official meetings and top officials, and curb any preferred treatment that the diplomats have so far enjoyed as a strategic partner of
India.

Outrage

The government's response was clearly shaped by the growing outrage, with Congress vice-president Rahul Gandhi and BJP prime ministerial candidate Narendra Modi refusing to meet a visiting bipartisan US congressional delegation in protest.

Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and Congress president Sonia Gandhi were briefed through the day on the issue. The government has assured Devyani's father that it will do all it can to bring her back.

President Pranab Mukherjee expressed serious concern at the situation, spending most of his meeting with India's US ambassador designate S. Jaishankar on the treatment the
Dalit officer has received in the US.

Home Minister Sushil Kumar Shinde, a Dalit, ensured swift action with the Delhi Police moving swiftly to remove the barricades.

National Security Advisor Shivshankar Menon, a strong supporter of close ties with the US, called Devyani's treatment "barbaric", and Foreign Secretary Sujatha Singh reviewed the situation with senior officials where a number of stern measures were discussed.

Sources say that Plan A is to take immediate measures on restricting diplomatic privileges available to US diplomats in India. Washington will be persuaded through diplomatic channels to let Devyani travel back to India.

"Either they drop the charges or she is expelled from the US. We are fine with either, but the bottom-line is that she has to be sent back to India soon," a senior official told Mail Today.

If the US persists with its present course of action, Plan B may kick in. This will involve prohibiting the spouses of US diplomats and their kin working in India, besides intense scrutiny of staffers at the United States Information Service or American Centres in India, as well as screening of staffers working with the American school.

Such is the sense of outrage that tit-for-tat treatment of a US consular official is also being considered, top officials privy to the discussions told Mail Today.

A town hall meeting of IFS officers at South Block saw Foreign Secretary Sujatha Singh being told by the officers present that US must be taught a lesson.

'Protected'

"We are distressed at the treatment that Dr Khobragade has received at the hands of US authorities. There was simply no reason to have arrested her on the street in front of her daughter's school. Similarly situated individuals of her stature are routinely provided an opportunity to report to the authorities to address charges, at their convenience, instead of being swept off the street like a common criminal," one officer said.

Daniel N. Arshack, Devyani's lawyer, told Mail Today: "Dr Khobragade is protected from prosecution by virtue of her diplomatic status. This entire prosecution represents a significant error in judgment and an embarrassing failure of US international protocol.

We expect a prompt resolution of this matter"

The US Embassy had no comments.

 

Yashwant invokes Article 377


With India cutting down the privileges of US diplomats following Devyani Khobragade's arrest in New York, BJP leader Yaswant Sinha on Tuesday demanded that the government take action against US personnel in India having same-sex companions following the Supreme Court order against gay sex.

"The media has reported that we have issued visas to a number of US diplomats' companions. 'Companions' means they are of the same sex. Now, after the Supreme Court ruling, it is completely illegal in our country, just as paying less wages was illegal in the US. So, why does not the government of India go ahead and arrest them and punish them?" Sinha said.

India has been upset over the arrest of Deputy Counsel General Devyani Khobragade, a 1999-batch IFS officer, on a street in New York over visa fraud charges as she was dropping her daughter to school.

She was later released on a $250,000 (Rs 1.5 crore) bond after pleading not guilty in court.
-------------------------------------------------------------------

Arrest of Indian diplomat in New York sparks U.S.-India tensions

By Annie Gowen, Published: December 17

NEW DELHI — The Indian government, furious about the rough treatment of a female diplomat arrested in New York last week, moved Tuesday to sharply rein in privileges of U.S. diplomats working in India, escalating a rare dispute between the two normally friendly nations.

India took what a senior government official termed “reciprocal measures,” revoking the ID
cards of U.S. Embassy personnel and their families, rescinding airport passes, freezing embassy imports of liquor and other goods, and investigating salaries paid to Indian staff members at U.S. consulates and as domestic help, as well as those teaching at U.S. schools in the country. As a final slap, Indian authorities removed concrete security barricades from outside the embassy complex in New Delhi.

Indian officials have alleged that the 39-year-old diplomat was strip-searched, cavity-searched and swabbed for DNA after her arrest in New York on fraud charges Thursday, then confined with hardened drug criminals until her release the same day on $250,000 bail. India’s national security adviser called the treatment “despicable and barbaric.”

“Everything that can be done will be done,” India’s foreign minister, Salman Khurshid, said Tuesday. “I can assure you we take this thing very seriously.”

The conflict began last week, when the deputy consul general at India’s consulate in New York was arrested and charged with visa fraud. The woman, Devyani Khobragade, is accused of making false statements during the visa application for the Indian national she brought to the United States to serve as a member of the household staff. She is also accused of paying the woman less than the minimum wage.

Marie Harf, the State Department’s deputy spokeswoman, defended U.S. actions Monday, saying that the department’s diplomatic security officials had followed “standard procedures” during the arrest. She did not directly address reports that Khobragade was strip-searched and referred questions about arrest procedures to the U.S. Marshals Service, which handled intake and processing.

On Tuesday, Harf characterized the circumstances of the arrest as an “isolated episode” and a “law enforcement issue” and said they would be looked into.

“We understand that this is a sensitive issue for many in India,” she said. “Accordingly, we are looking into the intake procedures surrounding this arrest to ensure that all appropriate procedures were followed and every opportunity for courtesy was extended.”

The Marshals Service said in a statement Tuesday that “standard arrestee intake procedures” were followed. In response to specific news media queries about whether a strip search had been conducted, the service said, “Yes, Devyani Khobragade was subject to the same search procedures as other USMS arrestees held within the general prisoner population in the Southern District of New York.” It said she had been placed in an “available and appropriate cell.”
Asked Monday whether Khobragade was due any special consideration or enjoyed diplomatic immunity from prosecution, Harf drew a distinction between diplomatic and consular immunity.

“Under the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations, the Indian deputy consul general enjoys immunity from the jurisdiction of U.S. courts only with respect to acts performed in the exercise of consular functions,” Harf said. “So, in this case, she fell under that specific kind of immunity and would be liable to arrest pending trial pursuant a felony arrest warrant.”

Khobragade has remained publicly silent. But she wrote a note this week thanking her Indian diplomatic colleagues for their support and describing how she broke down several times while being strip-searched, according to an internal e-mail made available to The Washington Post.

According to court papers, Khobragade, who is described as an advocate for women’s issues, presented a work contract to U.S. authorities that said she would pay her maid-babysitter $9.75 an hour, as required.

But she later drew up a private contract with the maid and paid her only $3.31 an hour, the documents said. U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara said at the time of her arrest that foreign nationals brought to the United States to serve as domestic workers are entitled to the same protections against exploitation as U.S. citizens.

In the days since Khobragade’s arrest, the Indian government has lodged a formal complaint with Nancy Powell, the U.S. ambassador to India, and several high-ranking Indian politicians refused to meet with a visiting U.S. congressional delegation to show their displeasure over the matter.

Diplomats in India said the treatment meted out to the deputy consul was “unprecedented” in the nearly 75-year-old relationship between the two countries, which has warmed over the years as India liberalized its trade policies, experienced an economic boom and committed to a civil nuclear energy pact.

“This is not the way friends and partners behave,” said a senior Indian official who spoke on the condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the matter. “We’ve never in our history — even with unfriendly countries — had anybody treat a diplomat like this. This is an outrage among all of us.”

Anne Gearan and Jennifer Jenkins in Washington and Rama Lakshmi in New Delhi contributed to this report.

© The Washington Post Company

-------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Outrage in India, and Retaliation, Over a Female Diplomat’s Arrest in New York


By GARDINER HARRIS
Published: December 17, 2013 
BANGALORE, India — The way an Indian diplomat was treated by law enforcement officials in New York last week has touched off a furor in India, where politicians from across the political spectrum expressed outrage and the New Delhi police retaliated by removing security barriers that were meant to protect the American Embassy.

The diplomat, Devyani Khobragade, the deputy consul general in New York, was arrested last Thursday and accused of submitting false documents to obtain a work visa for her housekeeper and paying the housekeeper far less than the minimum legal wage. Indian officials said that Ms. Khobragade was arrested and handcuffed on the street as she was leaving her daughter at school, and that she was kept in a holding cell with drug addicts before she was released on $250,000 bail.

By far the most troubling part for Indians are assertions that Ms. Khobragade, 39, was strip-searched after her arrest. Some Indian newspapers published reports claiming that she was subjected to repeated cavity searches. The Indian national security adviser, Shivshankar Menon, has called such treatment “despicable” and “barbaric.”

The Indian government issued a statement the day after the arrest saying it was “shocked and appalled at the manner in which she has been humiliated by the U.S. authorities.” The foreign secretary, Sujatha Singh, summoned the American ambassador to India, Nancy J. Powell, and lodged a strong protest at the “unacceptable treatment” of the diplomat.

The United States Marshals Service, in a statement, confirmed that Ms. Khobragade had been strip-searched, following “the same search procedures as other U.S.M.S. arrestees held within the general prisoner population in the Southern District of New York.” It said she was “placed in the available and appropriate cell.”

Indian officials, in addition to removing the maze of concrete security barriers surrounding the American Embassy compound, Indian news reports said, have demanded that the embassy provide details about all the Indians it employs, as well as the names and salaries of teachers at the American Embassy School; that the embassy commissary stop importing liquor; and that diplomatic identification cards for consular staff members and their families be returned.

The State Department expressed concern on Tuesday about removal of the security barriers near the embassy. “We have conveyed at high levels to the government of India our expectations that India will continue to fulfill all of its obligations,” said Marie Harf, the deputy State Department spokeswoman.

Ms. Harf acknowledged that the State Department’s diplomatic security officials had played a role in Ms. Khobragade’s detention but said that federal marshals had been responsible for the “intake procedure.” Federal prosecutors say that the charges stem from a promise Ms. Khobragade made to American authorities that she would pay her housekeeper $4,500 a month. The prosecutors said she actually paid the housekeeper just $573 a month and made her work far more than 40 hours a week.

Ms. Khobragade’s lawyer said last week that she had pleaded not guilty and planned to challenge the arrest on grounds of diplomatic immunity. The charges against her carry maximum sentences of 10 years for visa fraud and five years for making a false declaration.

It is not unusual in India for domestic staff to be paid poorly and be required to work more than 60 hours a week; they are sometimes treated abominably. Reports of maids being imprisoned or abused by their employers are frequent.

But the idea of a middle-class woman being arrested and ordered to disrobe is seen as shocking. Airport security procedures in India provide separate lines for women, and any pat-down searches are performed behind curtains.

Top Indian officials are exempt from security screenings here, and long lists of officials who are permitted to bypass the screenings are posted at many Indian airports. When those officials are required to pass through security screenings in the United States and elsewhere, that fact often makes headlines in India and is seen by some as an insult to the country.

Hari Kumar contributed reporting from New Delhi, and Michael R. Gordon and Michael S. Schmidt from Washington.

A version of this article appears in print on December 18, 2013, on page A13 of the New York edition with the headline: Outrage in India, and Retaliation, Over a Female Diplomat’s Arrest in New York.